Skip to main content

Shoulda woulda coulda

 Is probably what Pictet are thinking. They started well, on February 25th 2020 declaring a huge borrowing of £4.4m of shares in Tullow in the very early days of the pandemonium. The price had already started to come down but I've assumed they did this for 51.94p. What's the problem you're thinking; it's only a little bit above that now.

So their next step was masterful; they bought back 90% of these shares at 11p, just 3 weeks later for 19% of the total original position. Ker ching! They've got "your" cash, well it must be someone's. Should they have bought that last 10% back they would have had a whopping £3.481m cosy profit. That's a million per week (albeit for an unlimited downside bet - can we really call this an investment?) At a push I would accept that it can be called insurance, although it makes me feel a bit more like in the movies where you see violent psychos collecting protection money so that nothing bad happens by accident you know.

Anyway, so they've got their protection money and are going to be back for the rest in another 3 weeks. However, they wait until the end of April, and decide that they will buy back the original position. This time at 22.5p. I think there might be a clue here; if you think something is overvalued at 52p, it's a lot less overvalued at half that. Of course if you think you can drive the business into the ground then you get to buy the shares back for pennies which will make your cat much fatter.

So the year keeps rolling on; the bad news keeps rolling in and Pictet borrow as many as 2.05% of Tullow shares. We've got this boss!! Although their position was now a much larger £9.6m; but they had all that original profit to tell stories about. Frankly they were probably becoming the office bore (albeit on Zoom).

Someone pointed out that the share price was going up, and as it reached 32p after a slightly worrysome Christmas and New Year they reached into their pocket and spent £870k buying back 10% of their position.

Then they bought back more on the 7th, 8th and 11th Jan. As the price started to rise into the 30's they were convinced that it would drop again and rebuilt their borrowings (although with less heart this time - just for show really) to 1.6%. 

They haven't thought it wise to borrow any more since 23rd Feb when the price was 37p. Probably quite a good idea. 

I'm sure they're telling the story of how they killed it last year with that short on Tullow though. The graph and spreadsheet tell a slightly different story.

I've added in a line at the end to show that it would cost them a cool £13.7m to close their position with a total loss across the whole position of £6.1m.

What would you do now if you were them? Do you think the oil price looks a bit toppy? Do you think Tullow will have any issue at all paying off its debt? Cripes; what if Tullow strike it lucky with their 1 in 3 chance of finding oil in Suriname in the next four weeks. The numbers for Tullow all stack up quite well IMHO without new exploration. It seems that the market is starting to agree.

They certainly look better for Tullow than Pictet.



I own shares in Tullow Oil. Please don't borrow to invest. Didn't you read chapter 1 in the book? Please do your own research, this is not investment advice (I should hope not; it looks like a dreadful idea)




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Metro Bank comparing new share price with old price - post 75m new shares

I wasn't actively tracking Metro Bank, but had been aware of the story these past few weeks. Over the weekend I started reading up about them. The close on Thursday was 536p trading up on Friday to close at 669p up 24.8%. As I write today they're up about 10% at 772p (It also was at 782p whilst working out some of the numbers below) The cash raise was priced at 500p a 36p discount to closing price on Thursday They wanted to raise £350m but actually raised £375m issuing 75m new shares. The BBC wrote about the crisis on 19th March '19 when the share price was 850p, it had dropped from 3396p on 27 July '18 (75% drop) Metro has debt of £249m Here's some high level analysis to translate old money into new money (partly as Google haven't updated the total voting rights (TVR) yet). 27th July '18 company valuation was Marcap £3,308,398,753 2nd May '19 TVR was 97,420,458 and Share price 650p Marcap £633,232,977 Share price at 500p Marcap £487,102

Valuing Ruvuma before the farm out

 There are two ways to value an oil or gas company, one is varying degrees of estimation of the quantity of oil or gas there is in the ground (and the costs to get it to market) and the other is the speed with which they can get it out of the ground once in production. This week, Aminex and their subsidiary Ndovu announced that Tanzanian government approval had been received for the Ruvuma farm out. They are no doubt dotting the i's and crossing the t's on the legal documents relating to transfer of 50% of the PSA and operatorship to ARA. Aminex started the week with a 75% working interest in Ruvuma, and may end next week with 25% and some cash. Some of this cash will be used to pay back the $5m they've borrowed from ARA over the last 12 months.$2m of this was needed to pay capital gains tax to the Tanzanian Government. As part of the farm out Aminex will get $5m and will be able to repay ARA and be back to where they started the year. They will also get a total of £1.97m i

£74k Portfolio to buy £8,000 FCF and £4,445 Dividends

 One of my key reasons to invest in a company is their ability to create free cash flow. At this time it's more important than ever. I do have some investments in companies that don't produce free cash flow (yet) such as Aminex, Eve Sleep and Independent Oil & Gas. I'm just doing some analysis on the companies I invest in and thought I would share the findings. Two of the companies that I'm particularly interested in are Tullow Oil and Gulf Keystone Petroleum . Those links take you to my blog posts where I'm happy to share my research (with further evidence based links to company data) Each company produces their data in a different way, using different ratios. One of my objectives for this blog post was to present companies side by side with a single % figure for their Free Cash Flow (FCF) divided into their marcap and a single % figure for their dividend divided into their marcap. I've used last year's data for most of the following companies, but for