Skip to main content

It started with a kiss

 Never thought it would come to this is no doubt what Odey is thinking about his cummulative borrowings of Tullow shares. Perhaps he hasn't worked it out as he's had some successes in other areas. Despite the 120 odd changes in their short position over 5 or 6 years I found that I could search and filter through short tracker.co.uk and Tullow's list of Total voting rights to get the numbers.

Methodology: The changes in the short position are exact. The share prices from Google are to within a week or so as it wasn't listing them all (hence you'll see a few records in a row with the same share price). This is the same for the total voting rights, I've broadly got the total number of shares right. I would say overall it's at least 95% accurate. It took an hour as it was (where do I find the time?) but would have taken much longer to get that last 5% accuracy.

It's worth pointing out that some large financial institutions short companies in certain sectors not because they think that they will go down, but as insurance against the oil market tanking. Of course the other reason to short a company is that you think it's over leveraged. Cast your mind back to 2015 and Tullow had net debt from memory of $4.8bn. It has worked away at that and has reduced it to $2.4bn at the end of 2020.

I don't really need to add much commentary to the data, as a) there's too much of it and b) the graph says it all.

I can't be sure of the share price used for the initial position (I've just taken the prevailing price)

I've added a line at the end showing Odear bying back all of his borrowings (which it hasn't yet done, but will need to... eventually?)

I've spared you from all the rows in the table but have shown the first set of records, which looks like a great investment to start with:


With a break and then the last set, not looking so good now methinks:


It might be easier to see the picture of cummulative gains/ losses on a graph


In summary here are the changes in the cummulative number by year:

2015 + £41,890,464
2016 + £  1,868,225
2017 -  £48,576,837
2018 - £22,842,054
2019 - £     753,151
2020 + £ 6,282,427
2021 -  £11,253,196 (to date, and not yet closed)


I really don't need to comment any more on this other than to say by the beginning of 2018 things weren't really going that well; the graph says it all. Please do your own research; remember rule 101 - don't borrow to invest. It might start out well, but then you may end up with confirmation bias described in this post. We've all probably been there at one point and aren't quite sure why we have a certain position anymore. I own shares in Tullow Oil. This isn't investment advice. Perhaps an offsite brain storming might come up with some new ideas; lest the promise of a kiss turns out to be more like a dementor than hot chocolate.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Metro Bank comparing new share price with old price - post 75m new shares

I wasn't actively tracking Metro Bank, but had been aware of the story these past few weeks. Over the weekend I started reading up about them. The close on Thursday was 536p trading up on Friday to close at 669p up 24.8%. As I write today they're up about 10% at 772p (It also was at 782p whilst working out some of the numbers below) The cash raise was priced at 500p a 36p discount to closing price on Thursday They wanted to raise £350m but actually raised £375m issuing 75m new shares. The BBC wrote about the crisis on 19th March '19 when the share price was 850p, it had dropped from 3396p on 27 July '18 (75% drop) Metro has debt of £249m Here's some high level analysis to translate old money into new money (partly as Google haven't updated the total voting rights (TVR) yet). 27th July '18 company valuation was Marcap £3,308,398,753 2nd May '19 TVR was 97,420,458 and Share price 650p Marcap £633,232,977 Share price at 500p Marcap £487,102

Valuing Ruvuma before the farm out

 There are two ways to value an oil or gas company, one is varying degrees of estimation of the quantity of oil or gas there is in the ground (and the costs to get it to market) and the other is the speed with which they can get it out of the ground once in production. This week, Aminex and their subsidiary Ndovu announced that Tanzanian government approval had been received for the Ruvuma farm out. They are no doubt dotting the i's and crossing the t's on the legal documents relating to transfer of 50% of the PSA and operatorship to ARA. Aminex started the week with a 75% working interest in Ruvuma, and may end next week with 25% and some cash. Some of this cash will be used to pay back the $5m they've borrowed from ARA over the last 12 months.$2m of this was needed to pay capital gains tax to the Tanzanian Government. As part of the farm out Aminex will get $5m and will be able to repay ARA and be back to where they started the year. They will also get a total of £1.97m i

£74k Portfolio to buy £8,000 FCF and £4,445 Dividends

 One of my key reasons to invest in a company is their ability to create free cash flow. At this time it's more important than ever. I do have some investments in companies that don't produce free cash flow (yet) such as Aminex, Eve Sleep and Independent Oil & Gas. I'm just doing some analysis on the companies I invest in and thought I would share the findings. Two of the companies that I'm particularly interested in are Tullow Oil and Gulf Keystone Petroleum . Those links take you to my blog posts where I'm happy to share my research (with further evidence based links to company data) Each company produces their data in a different way, using different ratios. One of my objectives for this blog post was to present companies side by side with a single % figure for their Free Cash Flow (FCF) divided into their marcap and a single % figure for their dividend divided into their marcap. I've used last year's data for most of the following companies, but for