Skip to main content

Metro Bank Institutional support

The Metro Bank share price initially reacted well to their successful and over-subscribed large share placing on 16th May 2019. Since the initial euphoria the share price has been drifting lower. Perhaps it was weighed down by a large number of short positions at the time. More recently many of these have closed as per the graph on short tracker shown below:



There has been some interesting trading from major holders these past few weeks. I built up my initial position at 650p to 700p and paid just over £8 for some more. I'm glad to see Fidelity also saw great value at 694p.

In fact Fidelity started out by selling more a third of their holding on 10th May at 533.5p according to this Guardian article. They clearly had sellers' remorse as by 22nd May the share price peaked at 813p. As the price drifed back, they took the opportunity to nearly double their holding from 5.37% to 9.53% on 5th June when the share price was 694p.

They've since added some more to 9.56% on 12th June. Here's a look at the share price performance over the last month.




The Spruce House Partnership also increased its holding from 5.06% to 6.77% on 5th June when sp was 694p. RNS

With Q2 results to be published on 24th July Metro Bank should be able to draw a line under this episode. They will undoubtedly make a large loss for the quarter but the figures are likely to show quite how carried away the market has been selling the shares.

As such, it's good to see the major shareholders have held firm, apart from a little wobble by Fidelity for which they paid the price. I expect they'll be laughing this time next year given the huge discount to net asset value. At 538p Metro Bank are valued at £928m but at the end of March had total assets of £22,569m and total liabilities of £20,788m. (I added in the extra £375m of capital raised mid May) More detail in this article

As you can see the gap is more than £928m it's actually £1,781m

How much do we think they're going to lose in Q2? £10m? £20m? Let's be ridiculous and call it £100m for the quarter. As such the gap between assets and liabilities (otherwise known as the Net Asset Value) is now £1,681m and you can buy that for 55 pence in the pound.

Or to put it another way (and assuming they don't lose £100m in Q2), the NAV is 1033p currently and you can buy that for about 53p in the pound. To put this into context, CYBG who own Virgin Money trade at 54% over their NAV (share price 197p to NAV of 128p). Lloyds Bank trade at 8% over their 53p NAV.

Here are some of the institutional holders profiled by the FT here. I've added some more information to the right as there have been RNS announcements in the last couple of weeks.



This is not investment advice, please do your own research. I own shares in Metro Bank.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Metro Bank comparing new share price with old price - post 75m new shares

I wasn't actively tracking Metro Bank, but had been aware of the story these past few weeks. Over the weekend I started reading up about them. The close on Thursday was 536p trading up on Friday to close at 669p up 24.8%. As I write today they're up about 10% at 772p (It also was at 782p whilst working out some of the numbers below) The cash raise was priced at 500p a 36p discount to closing price on Thursday They wanted to raise £350m but actually raised £375m issuing 75m new shares. The BBC wrote about the crisis on 19th March '19 when the share price was 850p, it had dropped from 3396p on 27 July '18 (75% drop) Metro has debt of £249m Here's some high level analysis to translate old money into new money (partly as Google haven't updated the total voting rights (TVR) yet). 27th July '18 company valuation was Marcap £3,308,398,753 2nd May '19 TVR was 97,420,458 and Share price 650p Marcap £633,232,977 Share price at 500p Marcap £487,102

Valuing Ruvuma before the farm out

 There are two ways to value an oil or gas company, one is varying degrees of estimation of the quantity of oil or gas there is in the ground (and the costs to get it to market) and the other is the speed with which they can get it out of the ground once in production. This week, Aminex and their subsidiary Ndovu announced that Tanzanian government approval had been received for the Ruvuma farm out. They are no doubt dotting the i's and crossing the t's on the legal documents relating to transfer of 50% of the PSA and operatorship to ARA. Aminex started the week with a 75% working interest in Ruvuma, and may end next week with 25% and some cash. Some of this cash will be used to pay back the $5m they've borrowed from ARA over the last 12 months.$2m of this was needed to pay capital gains tax to the Tanzanian Government. As part of the farm out Aminex will get $5m and will be able to repay ARA and be back to where they started the year. They will also get a total of £1.97m i

£74k Portfolio to buy £8,000 FCF and £4,445 Dividends

 One of my key reasons to invest in a company is their ability to create free cash flow. At this time it's more important than ever. I do have some investments in companies that don't produce free cash flow (yet) such as Aminex, Eve Sleep and Independent Oil & Gas. I'm just doing some analysis on the companies I invest in and thought I would share the findings. Two of the companies that I'm particularly interested in are Tullow Oil and Gulf Keystone Petroleum . Those links take you to my blog posts where I'm happy to share my research (with further evidence based links to company data) Each company produces their data in a different way, using different ratios. One of my objectives for this blog post was to present companies side by side with a single % figure for their Free Cash Flow (FCF) divided into their marcap and a single % figure for their dividend divided into their marcap. I've used last year's data for most of the following companies, but for