Skip to main content

Could Genel Energy have a P/E of 4.5 in 2019 ?

Followers of Genel Energy will know that they spent $1.3bn on a couple of gas and oil assets in Northern Iraq. These fields are Miran and Bina Bawi. Genel had been carrying a lot of weight on its balance sheet for Miran and in the most recent financial year they wrote off $424m which is about 140% of their EBITDAX. As such they didn't make a profit last year.

The purpose of this article is to look at a price / earnings ratio that ignores this one off write down. (By the way, the gas and oil is still in Miran; just not going to be produced anytime soon.)

At the bottom of page 10 in this presentation Genel talk about making $20m per month profit at an Oil Price (OP) of $60 increasing to around $30m per month at an OP of $80.

I would say that the OP has averaged $66 or $67 this year, let's say $66.

As such this would indicate that Genel are making $23m a month profit in the first 4 months. We know that Free Cash Flow was $44m for Jan/Feb according to this announcement.

(For Jan/ Feb the average OP looks like $62 which would indicate profit of $21m a month based on the reference on page 10 above)

So what does this mean?

If we extrapolate into the rest of the year using the current $72 OP this would generate $26m profit per month x 8 = $208m.  Adding in the 4 x $23m = $92m profit for the first four months and you've got $300m profit for 2019.

Let's take a more pessimistic view that average OP stays at $66 for the whole year so that's $276m profit for the year.

Both of these assume that production doesn't go up (it's forecast to go up by 10%)

When I first read that slide on p10 I took it to literally mean profit to the shareholder, but on reflection I think it is more like EBITDA.

Or to quote Genel, EBITDAX is defined as "EBITDAX is operating profit / (loss) adjusted for the add back of depreciation and amortisation ($136.2 million), exploration credit ($1.5million) and impairment of intangible assets ($424.0 million)"

As such I assume this is the same profit figure talked about on page 10 of the presentation

2018 EBITDAX was $304.1m
Take away $136.2 for depreciation
Take away $424 to write down Miran
Operating profit (254.6)
Average OP was $71.06

Let's say 2019 EBITDAX is $300m
Take away $150m for depreciation
No write downs
Operating profit $150m
Adding in the other numbers (similarly to 2018) gives earnings of 60c or 46p per share
Based on the 17th May share price of 207 this is a P/E of 4.5 or 22.2% of the share price

As such I conclude the current P/E is, 4.5 not including any increase in production this year.
(Ignoring last year's write down 2018 EPS was aprox 67c or 52p. P/E for 2018 would have been 3.98 or 25% of share price)

Given that we know Free Cash Flow was $44m in the first two months of the year, perhaps this puts operating profit/ EBITDAX even higher.

Question: is it likely that Genel will have an improving P/E (given a constant OP) or a worsening one.

Back to the important stuff, I think a price / earnings ratio of 4.5 is not too bad, as with a bit of compounding that must be: invest a dollar and double your money in 4 years. Genel can get 100% return on capex in Peshkabir in 3 months with 100% profit after 6 months, so not unreasonable to consider that a shareholder could double their money in four years.

This looks positive, why is the share price and P/E so low for Genel? What are the risks?

  • Whilst Genel have been paid by the Kurdish Regional Government (KRG) for 3 years there was a period before this when they weren't paid due to instability in the region. A settlement agreement is in place to pay back the money owing to Genel each month over a period of several years. This represents just over 20% of Genel's current monthly revenues and so when it ends 31/7/22 revenue will drop.
  • All sales of oil in Iraq used to go through the national sales organisation - SOMO. There is a case in arbitration at the moment to decide whether revenues for oil shipments via Turkey must be paid to SOMO again as they were when Genel first did business in Northern Iraq. SOMO may tear up the agreement to repay funds owing to Genel monthly and just repay several hundred million in one go. They may adopt the agreement reached by the KRG. There could be an agreement reached later in '19.
  • The Kurdish Region of Iraq has not had a sitting government for quite some years, but local parties agreed to form a government in the last few weeks. Relations between Erbil and Baghdad governments now seem to be on a stronger footing as budget payments have been made by Baghdad in the last year.
  • Northern Iraq borders Syria, Turkey and Iran


Here are some other Oil Companies P/E ratios for comparison.

ExxonMobil 18.03
Chevron 16.28
BP 14.66
Shell 11.76
GKP 10.85
ConocoPhillips 10.09
DNO 6.41
Genel 4.5 ?

Let's compare to a couple of other oil companies operating in the Kurdish Region of Iraq; GKP and DNO. If Genel's P/E was the same as Gulf Keystone Petroleum's (GKP) 10.85 the Genel share price would be 499p. Now I know that GKP are nearly doubling their production by this time next year, so that's probably why their P/E has gone up. Otherwise I think the two companies are quite comparable.

If Genel's P/E were the same 6.41 as DNO then the shareprice would be 295p. In both cases I'm ignoring the $424m technical writedown, which I suppose I shouldn't, but I don't think it will happen again.

The underlying figure I'm using is 46.67p EPS for Genel last year (ignoring Miran writedown). Assuming 2019 is the same (e.g. OP is a bit lower and production is a bit higher) then that's a 22.5% return on the 207p shareprice.

What feels about right for an oil company being regularly paid in Iraq? All the majors are north of 10 p/e, so let's say a max of eight. 8 x 46.67 = 373p. Didn't I see something on the shareholder FAQ that said all the 12 analysts were valuing the company well north of £3.

Next stop 7.6p ex dividend date 23rd May. (3.7% of 207p)

This is not investment advice, please do your own research. I own shares in Genel.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Metro Bank comparing new share price with old price - post 75m new shares

I wasn't actively tracking Metro Bank, but had been aware of the story these past few weeks. Over the weekend I started reading up about them. The close on Thursday was 536p trading up on Friday to close at 669p up 24.8%. As I write today they're up about 10% at 772p (It also was at 782p whilst working out some of the numbers below) The cash raise was priced at 500p a 36p discount to closing price on Thursday They wanted to raise £350m but actually raised £375m issuing 75m new shares. The BBC wrote about the crisis on 19th March '19 when the share price was 850p, it had dropped from 3396p on 27 July '18 (75% drop) Metro has debt of £249m Here's some high level analysis to translate old money into new money (partly as Google haven't updated the total voting rights (TVR) yet). 27th July '18 company valuation was Marcap £3,308,398,753 2nd May '19 TVR was 97,420,458 and Share price 650p Marcap £633,232,977 Share price at 500p Marcap £487,102

Valuing Ruvuma before the farm out

 There are two ways to value an oil or gas company, one is varying degrees of estimation of the quantity of oil or gas there is in the ground (and the costs to get it to market) and the other is the speed with which they can get it out of the ground once in production. This week, Aminex and their subsidiary Ndovu announced that Tanzanian government approval had been received for the Ruvuma farm out. They are no doubt dotting the i's and crossing the t's on the legal documents relating to transfer of 50% of the PSA and operatorship to ARA. Aminex started the week with a 75% working interest in Ruvuma, and may end next week with 25% and some cash. Some of this cash will be used to pay back the $5m they've borrowed from ARA over the last 12 months.$2m of this was needed to pay capital gains tax to the Tanzanian Government. As part of the farm out Aminex will get $5m and will be able to repay ARA and be back to where they started the year. They will also get a total of £1.97m i

Learning more about IOG

 As a relatively recent investor in IOG, I thought I would write up some of my research whilst waiting for that update about first gas. From the website "IOG is focussed on the Southern North Sea (SNS) with a fully-funded Saturn Banks Project consisting of a 50% operated stake in six proven gas discoveries plus the Saturn Banks Pipeline and onshore Saturn Banks Reception Facilities at the Bacton Gas Terminal." Bacton is in Norfolk and we own both the facilities there and a concrete pipeline to get there. We farmed out most of the other 50% to an Australian firm called CalEnergy in 2019 according to this article . They paid £40m upfront and will pay up to £125m in development costs. At the same time we launched a bond to raise aprox £70m. At the end of Feb 2020 as the first incling of the potential for a pandemic arose CalEnergy declined to spend a further £20m buying half of our stake in the Harvey and Redwell licences according to this article . At this point, the price per