Skip to main content

Running the numbers for Blythe and Elgood

Looking at three of IOG's fields and further to some analysis of the shareholders and brief history I thought I'd run some of the numbers as we have Blythe and Elgood producing first gas hopefully in early March.

Here are a few bullet points summarising each field (sourced primarily from corporate presentation 15th Dec)

Blythe 

  • platform successfully installed in Q2 -'21
  • Max gas rate of 45.5 mmscf/d in Q3 -'21
  • First gas expected a week after back gas

Elgood 

  • Max gas rate of 57.8 mmscf/d in Q3 - '21
  • First gas expected a week after back gas

Southwark

  • platform successfully installed in Q2 -'21
  • development drilling started Q4 -'21
  • Noble Hans Deul rig suspended drilling due to seabed conditions
  • Optimal plan is to resume drilling 25th Feb to 12th Mar (4-6 wks from Operational update 25 Jan)

Phase 1 capex Field Development plan
  • £305.5m
  • Overspend 20% to 25% once Southwark completed
  • 20% overspend would be FDP capex of £366.6m (extra £61.1m)
  • 25% overspend would be FDP capex of £381.9m (extra £76.4m)
CalEnergy have a 50% share in these fields. When Blythe and Elgood go into production there is a max gas rate of 45.5 + 57.8 million standard cubic feet per day which would be 103.3 mmscf/d. I'm not sure what sort of production ratio we might get, but will run the numbers at 70% and 90% of 103.3

70% of Max gas rate
This would be 72.31 mmscf/d. Our share of this is 36.155 mmscf/d
Using this handy tool to convert to therms that would be 371,814 therms per day
The current price for March delivery is £2.11 per therm
Daily revenue would therefore be 371,814 x £2.11 = £784,527
Assuming production starts 15th March that would leave 291 days
Revenue for 2022 (for the first two fields) would be 291 x £784,527 = £228m
To be on the safe side and planning for a diplomatic solution in Ukraine let's run that at 75% of the gas price i.e. £1.58 per therm. That would be £171m revenue for the year.
Based on the original planning case at £0.45 per therm that would be £48.7m in 2022

As such I think we're a little ahead of plan. No wonder the share price has risen from high teens to mid thirties.

90% of Max gas rate
This would be 92.97 mmscf/d. Our share of this is 46.48 mmscf/d
Using this handy tool to convert to therms that would be 477,928 therms per day
The current price for March delivery is £2.11 per therm
Daily revenue would therefore be 477,928 x £2.11 = £1,008,428
Assuming production starts 15th March that would leave 291 days
Revenue for 2022 (for the first two fields) would be 291 x £1,008,428 = £293m
To be on the safe side and planning for a diplomatic solution in Ukraine let's run that at 75% of the gas price i.e. £1.58 per therm. That would be £220m revenue for the year.
Based on the original planning case at £0.45 per therm that would be £62.5m in 2022

Another way of looking at this is what's the delta between 45p per therm and 211p per therm?

At 70% these 166p per therm equate to an additional £617k per day

At 90% these 166p per therm equate to an additional £793k per day

As such the overspend in the FDP of up to £76.4m would equate to 124 days of the lower production or 96 days of the higher production rate. In a project of this scale and number of years, it looks to me like we made the right decision to spend spend spend and get into production. Whilst of course we'd all prefer to have spent less than the original budget. Engineers eh! (I hope I haven't just alienated half of my audience)

I own shares in IOG, please don't take this as investment advice. IOG has a marcap of £179m as of 23rd Feb. 

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Metro Bank comparing new share price with old price - post 75m new shares

I wasn't actively tracking Metro Bank, but had been aware of the story these past few weeks. Over the weekend I started reading up about them. The close on Thursday was 536p trading up on Friday to close at 669p up 24.8%. As I write today they're up about 10% at 772p (It also was at 782p whilst working out some of the numbers below) The cash raise was priced at 500p a 36p discount to closing price on Thursday They wanted to raise £350m but actually raised £375m issuing 75m new shares. The BBC wrote about the crisis on 19th March '19 when the share price was 850p, it had dropped from 3396p on 27 July '18 (75% drop) Metro has debt of £249m Here's some high level analysis to translate old money into new money (partly as Google haven't updated the total voting rights (TVR) yet). 27th July '18 company valuation was Marcap £3,308,398,753 2nd May '19 TVR was 97,420,458 and Share price 650p Marcap £633,232,977 Share price at 500p Marcap £487,102...
2 comments
Read more

Short Hare vs Tullow Tortoise

Well that's a bit contrived but we are in a race; it's the shorts against the longs. The shorts want the Tullow price to go to 1p or less and the longs 100p or more. Where are we at the moment? Somewhere in the middle at 45p. There are actually at least 5 hares in this particular race; Odey, Pictet, Varde, Whitebox and Key Group. Key Group are flagging a bit and have dropped to 0.49% or less which means that they don't have to report anymore. Odey and Pictet seem convinced of victory and have raised their stake in the last week of February. Varde has decided they're too far ahead and have repaid 0.32% of the company value on 19 Feb. I expect they're very pleased with themselves as that cost just £1.54m on 19 Feb and would cost £2.06m in todays money 11 days later. So why do investment managers short stock? Broadly speaking it's for two reasons, the first is that they've gone through a discounted cash flow based valuation and looked at any other factors such ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Learning more about IOG

 As a relatively recent investor in IOG, I thought I would write up some of my research whilst waiting for that update about first gas. From the website "IOG is focussed on the Southern North Sea (SNS) with a fully-funded Saturn Banks Project consisting of a 50% operated stake in six proven gas discoveries plus the Saturn Banks Pipeline and onshore Saturn Banks Reception Facilities at the Bacton Gas Terminal." Bacton is in Norfolk and we own both the facilities there and a concrete pipeline to get there. We farmed out most of the other 50% to an Australian firm called CalEnergy in 2019 according to this article . They paid £40m upfront and will pay up to £125m in development costs. At the same time we launched a bond to raise aprox £70m. At the end of Feb 2020 as the first incling of the potential for a pandemic arose CalEnergy declined to spend a further £20m buying half of our stake in the Harvey and Redwell licences according to this article . At this point, the price per ...
Post a Comment
Read more