Skip to main content

Shoulda woulda coulda

 Is probably what Pictet are thinking. They started well, on February 25th 2020 declaring a huge borrowing of £4.4m of shares in Tullow in the very early days of the pandemonium. The price had already started to come down but I've assumed they did this for 51.94p. What's the problem you're thinking; it's only a little bit above that now.

So their next step was masterful; they bought back 90% of these shares at 11p, just 3 weeks later for 19% of the total original position. Ker ching! They've got "your" cash, well it must be someone's. Should they have bought that last 10% back they would have had a whopping £3.481m cosy profit. That's a million per week (albeit for an unlimited downside bet - can we really call this an investment?) At a push I would accept that it can be called insurance, although it makes me feel a bit more like in the movies where you see violent psychos collecting protection money so that nothing bad happens by accident you know.

Anyway, so they've got their protection money and are going to be back for the rest in another 3 weeks. However, they wait until the end of April, and decide that they will buy back the original position. This time at 22.5p. I think there might be a clue here; if you think something is overvalued at 52p, it's a lot less overvalued at half that. Of course if you think you can drive the business into the ground then you get to buy the shares back for pennies which will make your cat much fatter.

So the year keeps rolling on; the bad news keeps rolling in and Pictet borrow as many as 2.05% of Tullow shares. We've got this boss!! Although their position was now a much larger £9.6m; but they had all that original profit to tell stories about. Frankly they were probably becoming the office bore (albeit on Zoom).

Someone pointed out that the share price was going up, and as it reached 32p after a slightly worrysome Christmas and New Year they reached into their pocket and spent £870k buying back 10% of their position.

Then they bought back more on the 7th, 8th and 11th Jan. As the price started to rise into the 30's they were convinced that it would drop again and rebuilt their borrowings (although with less heart this time - just for show really) to 1.6%. 

They haven't thought it wise to borrow any more since 23rd Feb when the price was 37p. Probably quite a good idea. 

I'm sure they're telling the story of how they killed it last year with that short on Tullow though. The graph and spreadsheet tell a slightly different story.

I've added in a line at the end to show that it would cost them a cool £13.7m to close their position with a total loss across the whole position of £6.1m.

What would you do now if you were them? Do you think the oil price looks a bit toppy? Do you think Tullow will have any issue at all paying off its debt? Cripes; what if Tullow strike it lucky with their 1 in 3 chance of finding oil in Suriname in the next four weeks. The numbers for Tullow all stack up quite well IMHO without new exploration. It seems that the market is starting to agree.

They certainly look better for Tullow than Pictet.



I own shares in Tullow Oil. Please don't borrow to invest. Didn't you read chapter 1 in the book? Please do your own research, this is not investment advice (I should hope not; it looks like a dreadful idea)




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Metro Bank comparing new share price with old price - post 75m new shares

I wasn't actively tracking Metro Bank, but had been aware of the story these past few weeks. Over the weekend I started reading up about them. The close on Thursday was 536p trading up on Friday to close at 669p up 24.8%. As I write today they're up about 10% at 772p (It also was at 782p whilst working out some of the numbers below) The cash raise was priced at 500p a 36p discount to closing price on Thursday They wanted to raise £350m but actually raised £375m issuing 75m new shares. The BBC wrote about the crisis on 19th March '19 when the share price was 850p, it had dropped from 3396p on 27 July '18 (75% drop) Metro has debt of £249m Here's some high level analysis to translate old money into new money (partly as Google haven't updated the total voting rights (TVR) yet). 27th July '18 company valuation was Marcap £3,308,398,753 2nd May '19 TVR was 97,420,458 and Share price 650p Marcap £633,232,977 Share price at 500p Marcap £487,102...

Short Hare vs Tullow Tortoise

Well that's a bit contrived but we are in a race; it's the shorts against the longs. The shorts want the Tullow price to go to 1p or less and the longs 100p or more. Where are we at the moment? Somewhere in the middle at 45p. There are actually at least 5 hares in this particular race; Odey, Pictet, Varde, Whitebox and Key Group. Key Group are flagging a bit and have dropped to 0.49% or less which means that they don't have to report anymore. Odey and Pictet seem convinced of victory and have raised their stake in the last week of February. Varde has decided they're too far ahead and have repaid 0.32% of the company value on 19 Feb. I expect they're very pleased with themselves as that cost just £1.54m on 19 Feb and would cost £2.06m in todays money 11 days later. So why do investment managers short stock? Broadly speaking it's for two reasons, the first is that they've gone through a discounted cash flow based valuation and looked at any other factors such ...

Learning more about IOG

 As a relatively recent investor in IOG, I thought I would write up some of my research whilst waiting for that update about first gas. From the website "IOG is focussed on the Southern North Sea (SNS) with a fully-funded Saturn Banks Project consisting of a 50% operated stake in six proven gas discoveries plus the Saturn Banks Pipeline and onshore Saturn Banks Reception Facilities at the Bacton Gas Terminal." Bacton is in Norfolk and we own both the facilities there and a concrete pipeline to get there. We farmed out most of the other 50% to an Australian firm called CalEnergy in 2019 according to this article . They paid £40m upfront and will pay up to £125m in development costs. At the same time we launched a bond to raise aprox £70m. At the end of Feb 2020 as the first incling of the potential for a pandemic arose CalEnergy declined to spend a further £20m buying half of our stake in the Harvey and Redwell licences according to this article . At this point, the price per ...