Skip to main content

Neither a borrower or a lender be

 I was curious to see the point at which Whitebox started borrowing shares in Tullow, and before I knew it I was plotting the data into a spreadsheet. As I started I wasn't sure what I'd find, but these guys and girls must have deep pockets (or their customers do) as they're in for some serious fines at the library returning their overdue books.. er shares.

It's getting to be an expensive game borrowing Tullow shares. Looks like buying back those 0.24% announced today just cost Whitebox £1.7m. As far as I can tell from looking through 17 pages of history, they first reported their Tullow short on 12 March 2020 with 0.51%. The price at this point was 12.46p

However, we have to track a little further back as they built up their position before reporting. Let's be generous to them and assume that they took out nearly the whole loan on 31st Jan 2020 as news of the potential for Covid was building. The share price this day was 50.82p

As such our starting point is that they borrowed all of their shares at 50.82p and were "credited" with £3.6m. They might have borrowed them at a slightly lower price in which case they would have started with a lower credit balance.

They then borrowed a fifth more to get them to 0.61% on the 18th March at 7.55p (probably thought they were off to the races). The fact that they borrowed another fifth more says to me that they probably hadn't started as early as 31st Jan, and were just getting going.

A further third more and now up to 0.82% on 21st April at 16.28p

Reduced to 0.74% on 5th June at 30.39p (ouch)

Reduced to 0.32% on 8th June at 38.17 (oouchy)

Increased to 0.54% on 20th October at 16.51 (oops)

Increased to 0.65% on 5th Nov at 18.37 (can't get enough)

Increased to 0.83% on 6th Nov at 18.11 (we're winning boss)

Decreased to 0.72% on 24th Nov at 33.82 (not you're not)

Increased to 0.88% on 8th Jan '21 at 33p (I big brave boy)

Increased to 0.94% on 13th Jan at 34p (I am, snif)

Decreased to 0.83% on 10th Feb at 31.02p (lost nerve perhaps?)

Decreased to 0.78% on 15th Feb at 34.25p (close this down)

Deceased to 0.54% on 5th Mar at 50.82p (arggghhh)

Here it is on a spreadsheet (note that I've assumed they spent £4m today, the 8th March to pay off the remaining debt to share holders). They haven't announced this, they still have an unlimited debt.


and here it is on a graph


Over all it doesn't make me want to borrow shares in a company, even as the first whiff of a pandemic appears. They still don't know what they're in for and could be in for at least a £3m loss on an initial "can't lose" idea. I see they've borrowed shares in other companies and wonder where they got the idea to borrow Tullow shares from. You wouldn't want to be that friend who'd first mentioned it at shorters anonymous would you.

This is investment advice* not to short companies, and I don't do that. Please don't bother to do your own research this should be enough to put you off. (*I am joking of course, my legal Lemming dept made me add that.)



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Metro Bank comparing new share price with old price - post 75m new shares

I wasn't actively tracking Metro Bank, but had been aware of the story these past few weeks. Over the weekend I started reading up about them. The close on Thursday was 536p trading up on Friday to close at 669p up 24.8%. As I write today they're up about 10% at 772p (It also was at 782p whilst working out some of the numbers below) The cash raise was priced at 500p a 36p discount to closing price on Thursday They wanted to raise £350m but actually raised £375m issuing 75m new shares. The BBC wrote about the crisis on 19th March '19 when the share price was 850p, it had dropped from 3396p on 27 July '18 (75% drop) Metro has debt of £249m Here's some high level analysis to translate old money into new money (partly as Google haven't updated the total voting rights (TVR) yet). 27th July '18 company valuation was Marcap £3,308,398,753 2nd May '19 TVR was 97,420,458 and Share price 650p Marcap £633,232,977 Share price at 500p Marcap £487,102

Valuing Ruvuma before the farm out

 There are two ways to value an oil or gas company, one is varying degrees of estimation of the quantity of oil or gas there is in the ground (and the costs to get it to market) and the other is the speed with which they can get it out of the ground once in production. This week, Aminex and their subsidiary Ndovu announced that Tanzanian government approval had been received for the Ruvuma farm out. They are no doubt dotting the i's and crossing the t's on the legal documents relating to transfer of 50% of the PSA and operatorship to ARA. Aminex started the week with a 75% working interest in Ruvuma, and may end next week with 25% and some cash. Some of this cash will be used to pay back the $5m they've borrowed from ARA over the last 12 months.$2m of this was needed to pay capital gains tax to the Tanzanian Government. As part of the farm out Aminex will get $5m and will be able to repay ARA and be back to where they started the year. They will also get a total of £1.97m i

Learning more about IOG

 As a relatively recent investor in IOG, I thought I would write up some of my research whilst waiting for that update about first gas. From the website "IOG is focussed on the Southern North Sea (SNS) with a fully-funded Saturn Banks Project consisting of a 50% operated stake in six proven gas discoveries plus the Saturn Banks Pipeline and onshore Saturn Banks Reception Facilities at the Bacton Gas Terminal." Bacton is in Norfolk and we own both the facilities there and a concrete pipeline to get there. We farmed out most of the other 50% to an Australian firm called CalEnergy in 2019 according to this article . They paid £40m upfront and will pay up to £125m in development costs. At the same time we launched a bond to raise aprox £70m. At the end of Feb 2020 as the first incling of the potential for a pandemic arose CalEnergy declined to spend a further £20m buying half of our stake in the Harvey and Redwell licences according to this article . At this point, the price per