Skip to main content

Neither a borrower or a lender be

 I was curious to see the point at which Whitebox started borrowing shares in Tullow, and before I knew it I was plotting the data into a spreadsheet. As I started I wasn't sure what I'd find, but these guys and girls must have deep pockets (or their customers do) as they're in for some serious fines at the library returning their overdue books.. er shares.

It's getting to be an expensive game borrowing Tullow shares. Looks like buying back those 0.24% announced today just cost Whitebox £1.7m. As far as I can tell from looking through 17 pages of history, they first reported their Tullow short on 12 March 2020 with 0.51%. The price at this point was 12.46p

However, we have to track a little further back as they built up their position before reporting. Let's be generous to them and assume that they took out nearly the whole loan on 31st Jan 2020 as news of the potential for Covid was building. The share price this day was 50.82p

As such our starting point is that they borrowed all of their shares at 50.82p and were "credited" with £3.6m. They might have borrowed them at a slightly lower price in which case they would have started with a lower credit balance.

They then borrowed a fifth more to get them to 0.61% on the 18th March at 7.55p (probably thought they were off to the races). The fact that they borrowed another fifth more says to me that they probably hadn't started as early as 31st Jan, and were just getting going.

A further third more and now up to 0.82% on 21st April at 16.28p

Reduced to 0.74% on 5th June at 30.39p (ouch)

Reduced to 0.32% on 8th June at 38.17 (oouchy)

Increased to 0.54% on 20th October at 16.51 (oops)

Increased to 0.65% on 5th Nov at 18.37 (can't get enough)

Increased to 0.83% on 6th Nov at 18.11 (we're winning boss)

Decreased to 0.72% on 24th Nov at 33.82 (not you're not)

Increased to 0.88% on 8th Jan '21 at 33p (I big brave boy)

Increased to 0.94% on 13th Jan at 34p (I am, snif)

Decreased to 0.83% on 10th Feb at 31.02p (lost nerve perhaps?)

Decreased to 0.78% on 15th Feb at 34.25p (close this down)

Deceased to 0.54% on 5th Mar at 50.82p (arggghhh)

Here it is on a spreadsheet (note that I've assumed they spent £4m today, the 8th March to pay off the remaining debt to share holders). They haven't announced this, they still have an unlimited debt.


and here it is on a graph


Over all it doesn't make me want to borrow shares in a company, even as the first whiff of a pandemic appears. They still don't know what they're in for and could be in for at least a £3m loss on an initial "can't lose" idea. I see they've borrowed shares in other companies and wonder where they got the idea to borrow Tullow shares from. You wouldn't want to be that friend who'd first mentioned it at shorters anonymous would you.

This is investment advice* not to short companies, and I don't do that. Please don't bother to do your own research this should be enough to put you off. (*I am joking of course, my legal Lemming dept made me add that.)



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Short Hare vs Tullow Tortoise

Well that's a bit contrived but we are in a race; it's the shorts against the longs. The shorts want the Tullow price to go to 1p or less and the longs 100p or more. Where are we at the moment? Somewhere in the middle at 45p. There are actually at least 5 hares in this particular race; Odey, Pictet, Varde, Whitebox and Key Group. Key Group are flagging a bit and have dropped to 0.49% or less which means that they don't have to report anymore. Odey and Pictet seem convinced of victory and have raised their stake in the last week of February. Varde has decided they're too far ahead and have repaid 0.32% of the company value on 19 Feb. I expect they're very pleased with themselves as that cost just £1.54m on 19 Feb and would cost £2.06m in todays money 11 days later. So why do investment managers short stock? Broadly speaking it's for two reasons, the first is that they've gone through a discounted cash flow based valuation and looked at any other factors such ...

Metro Bank comparing new share price with old price - post 75m new shares

I wasn't actively tracking Metro Bank, but had been aware of the story these past few weeks. Over the weekend I started reading up about them. The close on Thursday was 536p trading up on Friday to close at 669p up 24.8%. As I write today they're up about 10% at 772p (It also was at 782p whilst working out some of the numbers below) The cash raise was priced at 500p a 36p discount to closing price on Thursday They wanted to raise £350m but actually raised £375m issuing 75m new shares. The BBC wrote about the crisis on 19th March '19 when the share price was 850p, it had dropped from 3396p on 27 July '18 (75% drop) Metro has debt of £249m Here's some high level analysis to translate old money into new money (partly as Google haven't updated the total voting rights (TVR) yet). 27th July '18 company valuation was Marcap £3,308,398,753 2nd May '19 TVR was 97,420,458 and Share price 650p Marcap £633,232,977 Share price at 500p Marcap £487,102...

Comparing Metro Bank bond prices to equity this year

 I've just done a quick comparison of bond prices for Metro Bank from this source data  for bonds and this source data for equity. Here are the absolute values each month of this year. (Bond prices in Blue, Share price in Red) Setting both to start at 100 makes it relatively more interesting. It seems that the bond prices are leading the equity prices over the whole year. Bonds are 76% of their value from the begining of the year whilst shares are only 66% of their value from the start of the year. Is the equity on track to close the gap? 76% of the value of the share price at the begining of the year would be 153p. It looked like it was trying to make it on Monday afternoon. Perhaps we'll get there next Monday.. oh no that's a bank holiday. Make that Tuesday then. I own shares in Metro Bank. This is not investment advice. Please do your own research. I'm happy to share mine.