Skip to main content

Valuing Ruvuma before the farm out

 There are two ways to value an oil or gas company, one is varying degrees of estimation of the quantity of oil or gas there is in the ground (and the costs to get it to market) and the other is the speed with which they can get it out of the ground once in production. This week, Aminex and their subsidiary Ndovu announced that Tanzanian government approval had been received for the Ruvuma farm out.

They are no doubt dotting the i's and crossing the t's on the legal documents relating to transfer of 50% of the PSA and operatorship to ARA. Aminex started the week with a 75% working interest in Ruvuma, and may end next week with 25% and some cash. Some of this cash will be used to pay back the $5m they've borrowed from ARA over the last 12 months.$2m of this was needed to pay capital gains tax to the Tanzanian Government.

As part of the farm out Aminex will get $5m and will be able to repay ARA and be back to where they started the year. They will also get a total of £1.97m in regular payments over the next 6 months.

Doesn't sound like much so far for selling 2/3 of your gas field does it. Well, as an upstream gas company Aminex are not really geared up to take such a field into production themselves. These projects take years, and looking at a similar one in Tanzania near to the island of Songo Songo there are 100's of millions of costs to get production started. Not least giving two separate $100m contracts to an Indian construction firm Larsen & Toubro, with one of the contracts awarded in 2003. Songo Songo has proven the model for Tanzania and no doubt developed a local gas market. Orca Exploration Group listed on the Canadian Venture Exchange runs operations on Songa Island.

As part of the farm out Aminex will also have their share of the first $140m of costs ($35m) paid for. This sounds a bit like a mortgage in reverse; building something for $140m and owning a quarter of it until 2035. What's the value of that today? I would go so far as to say probably at least $35m, but I'm sure Aminex have some fairly detailed discounted cash flow spreadsheets that show revenues building up in a year or three and a more accurate picture of that value in net present terms.

Valuing an asset like Ruvuma requires access to this data, and hopefully we'll see some of that start to be shared upon signature of the farmout. In the meantime, I thought it would be interesting to look at the value of a future quarter share of Ruvuma in comparative pricing terms with a company such as Orca.

A couple of years ago there was a report published that showed the reseves available to Orca until the end of their licence. This is summarised here, and is 554 billion cubic feet of gas (261+293).

Ruvuma has gas reserves of 3.074 trillion cubic feet of gas according to slide 5 of this presentation

As such on a very simplistic basis and in a year or three when production has got under way, Aminex will have access to 0.25 x 3074 bcf = 768.5 bcf of gas. This represents about 64% more than Orca. 

What is Orca worth today? 251m Canadian dollars (£147m).

Using the current Aminex share price of 1.45p and marcap of £55.09m I make a comparative valuation of 6.36p per Aminex share for Ruvuma. Workings [1.64 x £147 = £241.6m. Then, (241.6/55.09) x 1.45 = 6.36p ]

This is of course a simplistic overview of the Ruvuma farm out, I've only been following Aminex for a few weeks. I've no doubt that there is more to Aminex than the 768 billion cubic feet of gas available to them until 2035 in Ruvuma. 

As more detail appears, it will be interesting to watch their evolution. I first bought into Aminex at around 0.9p a few weeks ago, then some more around 0.45p. I've bought more in the 1.2p to 1.5p range. Please do your own research, this is not investment advice. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Metro Bank comparing new share price with old price - post 75m new shares

I wasn't actively tracking Metro Bank, but had been aware of the story these past few weeks. Over the weekend I started reading up about them. The close on Thursday was 536p trading up on Friday to close at 669p up 24.8%. As I write today they're up about 10% at 772p (It also was at 782p whilst working out some of the numbers below) The cash raise was priced at 500p a 36p discount to closing price on Thursday They wanted to raise £350m but actually raised £375m issuing 75m new shares. The BBC wrote about the crisis on 19th March '19 when the share price was 850p, it had dropped from 3396p on 27 July '18 (75% drop) Metro has debt of £249m Here's some high level analysis to translate old money into new money (partly as Google haven't updated the total voting rights (TVR) yet). 27th July '18 company valuation was Marcap £3,308,398,753 2nd May '19 TVR was 97,420,458 and Share price 650p Marcap £633,232,977 Share price at 500p Marcap £487,102

Metro Bank - regulation, reporting and market sentiment

Several things will need to happen before MetroBank is allowed to recover. I'll divide these into two categories: 1) regulatory and reporting 2) emotional 1) Regulatory and reporting.  Having done a bit of research it seems to me that the relevant regulatory authorities are The Bank, FCA and PRA. The Bank of England did a handy announcement on the day of the new share sale saying that Metro are profitable, have enough money and this new money is for growth. The Prudential Regulation Authority seem to judge the appropriateness of board members in banking and can ban people. Metro have 6 or their 9 board members who've been in position since the beginning in 2010 and are now nearing the end of their 9 year "maximum" term. These mates are seen as a bit too insider-ish it would seem. Usually people don't get banned per se, but withdraw their application for continued tenure and step aside gracefully. We'll probably see some new blood appearing on the BOD (an