Skip to main content

Metro Bank Institutional support

The Metro Bank share price initially reacted well to their successful and over-subscribed large share placing on 16th May 2019. Since the initial euphoria the share price has been drifting lower. Perhaps it was weighed down by a large number of short positions at the time. More recently many of these have closed as per the graph on short tracker shown below:



There has been some interesting trading from major holders these past few weeks. I built up my initial position at 650p to 700p and paid just over £8 for some more. I'm glad to see Fidelity also saw great value at 694p.

In fact Fidelity started out by selling more a third of their holding on 10th May at 533.5p according to this Guardian article. They clearly had sellers' remorse as by 22nd May the share price peaked at 813p. As the price drifed back, they took the opportunity to nearly double their holding from 5.37% to 9.53% on 5th June when the share price was 694p.

They've since added some more to 9.56% on 12th June. Here's a look at the share price performance over the last month.




The Spruce House Partnership also increased its holding from 5.06% to 6.77% on 5th June when sp was 694p. RNS

With Q2 results to be published on 24th July Metro Bank should be able to draw a line under this episode. They will undoubtedly make a large loss for the quarter but the figures are likely to show quite how carried away the market has been selling the shares.

As such, it's good to see the major shareholders have held firm, apart from a little wobble by Fidelity for which they paid the price. I expect they'll be laughing this time next year given the huge discount to net asset value. At 538p Metro Bank are valued at £928m but at the end of March had total assets of £22,569m and total liabilities of £20,788m. (I added in the extra £375m of capital raised mid May) More detail in this article

As you can see the gap is more than £928m it's actually £1,781m

How much do we think they're going to lose in Q2? £10m? £20m? Let's be ridiculous and call it £100m for the quarter. As such the gap between assets and liabilities (otherwise known as the Net Asset Value) is now £1,681m and you can buy that for 55 pence in the pound.

Or to put it another way (and assuming they don't lose £100m in Q2), the NAV is 1033p currently and you can buy that for about 53p in the pound. To put this into context, CYBG who own Virgin Money trade at 54% over their NAV (share price 197p to NAV of 128p). Lloyds Bank trade at 8% over their 53p NAV.

Here are some of the institutional holders profiled by the FT here. I've added some more information to the right as there have been RNS announcements in the last couple of weeks.



This is not investment advice, please do your own research. I own shares in Metro Bank.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Short Hare vs Tullow Tortoise

Well that's a bit contrived but we are in a race; it's the shorts against the longs. The shorts want the Tullow price to go to 1p or less and the longs 100p or more. Where are we at the moment? Somewhere in the middle at 45p. There are actually at least 5 hares in this particular race; Odey, Pictet, Varde, Whitebox and Key Group. Key Group are flagging a bit and have dropped to 0.49% or less which means that they don't have to report anymore. Odey and Pictet seem convinced of victory and have raised their stake in the last week of February. Varde has decided they're too far ahead and have repaid 0.32% of the company value on 19 Feb. I expect they're very pleased with themselves as that cost just £1.54m on 19 Feb and would cost £2.06m in todays money 11 days later. So why do investment managers short stock? Broadly speaking it's for two reasons, the first is that they've gone through a discounted cash flow based valuation and looked at any other factors such ...

Metro Bank comparing new share price with old price - post 75m new shares

I wasn't actively tracking Metro Bank, but had been aware of the story these past few weeks. Over the weekend I started reading up about them. The close on Thursday was 536p trading up on Friday to close at 669p up 24.8%. As I write today they're up about 10% at 772p (It also was at 782p whilst working out some of the numbers below) The cash raise was priced at 500p a 36p discount to closing price on Thursday They wanted to raise £350m but actually raised £375m issuing 75m new shares. The BBC wrote about the crisis on 19th March '19 when the share price was 850p, it had dropped from 3396p on 27 July '18 (75% drop) Metro has debt of £249m Here's some high level analysis to translate old money into new money (partly as Google haven't updated the total voting rights (TVR) yet). 27th July '18 company valuation was Marcap £3,308,398,753 2nd May '19 TVR was 97,420,458 and Share price 650p Marcap £633,232,977 Share price at 500p Marcap £487,102...

Comparing Metro Bank bond prices to equity this year

 I've just done a quick comparison of bond prices for Metro Bank from this source data  for bonds and this source data for equity. Here are the absolute values each month of this year. (Bond prices in Blue, Share price in Red) Setting both to start at 100 makes it relatively more interesting. It seems that the bond prices are leading the equity prices over the whole year. Bonds are 76% of their value from the begining of the year whilst shares are only 66% of their value from the start of the year. Is the equity on track to close the gap? 76% of the value of the share price at the begining of the year would be 153p. It looked like it was trying to make it on Monday afternoon. Perhaps we'll get there next Monday.. oh no that's a bank holiday. Make that Tuesday then. I own shares in Metro Bank. This is not investment advice. Please do your own research. I'm happy to share mine.